Oliver Crawford vs Kody Pearson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

How crucial is the second serve in predicting a tennis match outcome? If we scrutinize the recent form over the past six months, Pearson has managed to win only 37.29% of points on their second serve, contrasted with Crawford’s more impressive 45.98%. This statistic alone can often determine the winner in closely contested matches.

When it comes to returning serves, Pearson seems to have a slight edge, having secured 48.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while Crawford has captured 44.49%. The first serve returns, another key indicator of a player’s ability to handle pressure, present another advantage for Pearson, who leads with 30.64% over Crawford’s 27.75%. These numbers can wield significant influence when picking a likely winner in this head-to-head encounter.

Considering breakpoint opportunities, Crawford holds the upper hand again. With a 57.47% success rate in saving breakpoints compared to Pearson's 48.63%, Crawford seems better equipped to withstand critical moments in a match. Such resilience is invaluable for in-game betting predictions.

Reflect on the overall performance of each player. In the past year, Pearson has won only 41.67% of their matches (15 wins, 21 losses), while Crawford boasts a superior record, winning 67.16% of matches (45 wins, 22 losses). This broader perspective offers a compelling head-to-head prediction overview.

The playing surface also plays a crucial role. Pearson shines brightest on Grass, with a 55% success rate but struggles significantly on Indoor Hard courts, having never triumphed (0 win, 3 losses). Conversely, Crawford thrives on Hard courts with an impressive 70% success rate, though they falter on Grass, yet to win a match (0 win, 1 loss).

Analyzing the event level paints a clearer picture. Over the last year, Pearson has spent most of their time in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, securing victory in 46.67% of matches (14 wins, 16 losses). Crawford, competing in the same level of events, achieved an outstanding 80% win rate (40 wins, 10 losses), highlighting their superior performance in similar competitive arenas.

Let's not forget the quality of their opponents. Over the past year, Pearson has faced players with an average rank of 382.75, while Crawford's opponents averaged a ranking of 419.15. Though it may seem subtle, this difference could impact their preparedness and adaptability against higher-ranked challengers.

Finally, when a match extends into a deciding set, historical performance can signal likely outcomes. Pearson has emerged victorious in 56% of such sets over the last 12 months. However, Crawford, once again, outperforms with a 65% success rate. This statistic has critical implications for live predictions and betting enthusiasts.

Given all these factors, who seems poised to capture this match? While Pearson demonstrates competence in certain statistics, Crawford's impressive majority of metrics, including their breakpoint saves, overall win rate, and domination on hard surfaces, suggest they have the edge in predicting the victor of this upcoming match.